THE CHURCH: ITS NATURE, ITS MARKS, AND ITS PURPOSES

The Nature of the Church

 

Definition: The church is the community of all true believers for all time.  This defi­nition understands the church to be made of all those who are truly saved.  Paul says, “Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her” (Ephesians 5:25).  Here the term “the church” is used to apply to all those whom Christ died to redeem, all those who are saved by the death of Christ.  But that must include all true believers for all time, both believ­ers in the New Testament age and believers in the Old Testament age as well.  So great is God’s plan for the church that he has exalted Christ to a position of highest authority for the sake of the church: “He has put all things under his feet and has made him the head over all things for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all” (Ephesians 1:22 – 23).

Jesus Christ himself builds the church by calling his people to himself.  He promised, “I will build my church” (Matthew 16:18).  And Luke is careful to tell us that the growth of the church came not by human effort alone, but that “the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47).  But this process whereby Christ builds the church is just a continuation of the pattern established by God in the Old Testament whereby he called people to himself to be a worshiping assembly before him.  There are sev­eral indications in the Old Testament that God thought of his people as a “church,” a people assembled for the purpose of worshiping God.  When Moses tells the people that the Lord said to him, “Gather the people to me, that I may let them hear my words, so that they may learn to fear me all the days that they live upon the earth … (Deuteronomy 4:10).  Even though there are certainly new privileges and new blessings that are given to the people of God in the New Testament, both the usage of the term “church” in Scripture and the fact that throughout Scripture God has always called his people to assemble to worship himself, indicate that it is appropriate to think of the church as constituting all the people of God for all time, both Old Testament believers and New Testament believers.

The Church Is Invisible, Yet Visible.  In its true spiritual reality as the fellowship of all genuine believers, the church is invisible.  This is because we cannot see the spiritual condition of people’s hearts.  We can see those who outwardly attend the church, and we can see outward evidences of inward spiritual change, but we cannot actually see into people’s hearts and view their spiritual state, only God can do that.  This is why Paul says, “The Lord knows those who are his” (2 Timothy 2:19).  Even in our own churches and our own neighborhoods, only God knows who are true believers with certainty and without error.  In speaking of the church as invisible the author of Hebrews speaks of the “assembly (literally, “church”) of the first-born who are enrolled in heaven” (Hebrews 12:23), and says that present-day Christians join with that assembly in worship.

On the other hand, the true church of Christ certainly has a visible aspect as well.  We may use the following definition: The visible church is the church as Christians an earth see it.  In this sense the visible church includes all who profess faith in Christ and give evidence of that faith in their lives.?

In this definition, we do not say that the visible church is the church as any person in the world (such as an unbeliever or someone who held heretical teachings) might see it, but we mean to speak of the church as it is perceived by those who are genuine believers and have an understanding of the difference between believers and unbelievers.

When Paul writes his epistles he writes to the visible church in each community: “To the church of God which is at Corinth” (1 Corinthians 1:2); “To the church of the Thessalonians” (1 Thessalonians 1:1); “To Philemon … and Apphia . and Archippus . . and the church in your house” (Philemon 1-2).  Paul certainly realized that there were unbelievers in some of those churches, some who had made a profession of faith that was not genuine, who appeared to be Christians but would eventually fall away.  Yet neither Paul nor anyone else could tell with certainty who those people were.  Paul simply wrote to the entire church that met together in any one place.  In this sense, we could say today that the visible church is the group of people who come together each week to worship as a church and profess faith in Christ.

The visible church throughout the world will always include some unbelievers, and individual congregations will usually include some unbelievers, because we cannot see hearts as God sees them.  Paul speaks of “Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have swerved from the truth” and who “are upsetting the faith of some” (2 Timothy 2:17 – 18).  But he is confident that “The Lord knows those who are his” (2 Timothy 2:19).  Paul says with sor­row, “Demas, in love with this present world, has deserted me and gone to Thessalonica” (2 Timothy 4:10).

Similarly, Paul warns the Ephesian elders that after his departure “fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them” (Acts 20:29-30).  Jesus himself warned, “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.  You will know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:15-16).  Real­izing this distinction between the church invisible and the church visible, Augustine said of the visible church, “Many sheep are without and many wolves are within.”

When we recognize that there are unbelievers in the visible church, there is a danger that we may become overly suspicious.  We may begin to doubt the salvation of many true believers and thereby bring great confusion into the church. We should not try to exclude people from the fellowship of the church until they by public sin bring discipline upon themselves.  On the other hand, of course, the church should not tolerate in its membership “public unbelievers” who by profession or life clearly proclaim themselves to be outside the true church.

The Church Is Local and Universal.  In the New Testament, the word “church” may be applied to a group of believers at any level, ranging from a very small group meeting in a private home all the way to the group of all true believers in the universal church.  A “house church” is called a “church” in Romans 16:5 (“greet also the church in their house“), 1 Corinthians 16:19 (“Aquila and Prisca, together with the church in their house, send you hearty greetings in the Lord”).  The church in an entire city is also called “a church” (1 Corinthians 1:2; 2 Corinthians 1:1; and 1 Thessalonians 1:1).  The church in a region is referred to as a “church” in Acts 9:31: “So the church throughout all Judea and Galilee and Samaria had peace and was built up.”  Finally, the church throughout the entire world can be referred to as “the church.”  Paul says, “Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her” (Ephesians 5:25) and says, “God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers …” (1 Corinthians 12:28).  In this latter verse the mention of “apostles,” who were not given to any individual church, guarantees that the reference is to the church universal.

We may conclude that the group of God’s people considered at any level from local to universal may rightly be called “a church.”  We should not make the mistake of saying that only a church meeting in houses expresses the true nature of the church, or only a church considered at a city-wide level can rightly be called a church, or only the church universal can rightly be called by the name “church.” Rather, the community of God’s people considered at any level can be rightly called a church.

The Church and the Kingdom of God.  What is the relationship between the church and the kingdom of God?  It can be said that there are five specific aspects of the relationship between the kingdom and the church: (1) The church is not the kingdom (for Jesus and the early Christians preached that the kingdom of God was near, not that the church was near, and preached the good news of the kingdom, not the good news of the church: Acts 8:12; 19:8; 20:25; 28:23, 31).  (2) The kingdom creates the church (for as people enter into God’s kingdom they become joined to the human fellowship of the church).  (3) The church witnesses to the kingdom (for Jesus said, “this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world,” Matt. 24:14).  (4) The church is the instrument of the kingdom (for the Holy Spirit, manifesting the power of the kingdom, works through the disciples to heal the sick and cast out demons, as he did in the ministry of Jesus: Matthew 10:8; Luke 10:17).  (5) The church is the custodian of the kingdom (for the church has been given the keys of the kingdom of heaven: Matthew 16:19).

We should not identify the kingdom of God as the church, nor should we see the kingdom of God as entirely future, something distinct from the church age. Rather, we should recognize that there is a close connection between the kingdom of God and the church.  As the church proclaims the good news of the kingdom, people will come into the church and begin to experience the blessings of God’s rule in their lives.  The kingdom manifests itself through the church, and thereby the future reign of God breaks into the present (it is “already” here: Matthew 12:28; Romans 14:17; and “not yet” here fully: Matthew 25:34; 1 Corinthians 6:9 -10). Therefore, those who believe in Christ will begin to experience something of what God’s final kingdom reign will be like: they will know some measure of victory over sin (Romans 6:14; 14:17), over demonic opposition (Luke 10:17), and over disease (Luke 10:9).  They will live in the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 12:28; Romans 8:4 – 17; 14:17), who is the dynamic power of the coming kingdom.  Eventually Jesus will return and his kingdom reign will extend over all creation (1 Corinthians 15:24 – 28).

The “Marks” of the Church (Distinguishing Characteristics)

There Are True Churches and False Churches.  What makes a church a church?  What is necessary to have a church?  Might a group of people who claim to be Christians become so unlike what a church should be that they should no longer be called a church?

In the early centuries of the Christian church, there was little controversy about what was a true church.  There was only one world-wide church, the “visible” church through­out the world, and that was, of course, the true church.  This church had bishops and local clergymen and church buildings which everyone could see.  Any heretics who were found to be in serious doctrinal error were simply excluded from the church.

But at the Reformation a crucial question came up: how can we recognize a true church?  In order to answer that question people had to decide what were the “marks” of a true church, the distinguishing characteristics that lead us to recognize it as a true church.  Scripture certainly speaks of false churches.  Paul says of the pagan temples in Corinth, “What pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God” (1 Corinthians 10:20).  He tells the Corinthians that “when you were heathen, you were led astray to dumb idols” (1 Corinthians 12:2).  These pagan temples were certainly false churches or false religious assemblies.  Moreover, Scripture speaks of a religious assembly that is really a “synagogue of Satan” (Revelation 2:9; 3:9).  Here the risen Lord Jesus seems to be referring to Jewish assemblies that claim to be Jews but were not true Jews who had saving faith.  Their religious assembly was not an assembly of Christ’s people but of those who still belonged to the kingdom of darkness, the kingdom of Satan. This also would certainly be a false church.

We can define the church as “Wherever we see the Word of God purely preached and heard, and the sacraments administered according to Christ’s institution, there, it is not to be doubted, a church of God exists.”   If the Word of God is not being preached, but simply false doctrines or doctrines of men, then there is no true church.  In some cases, we might have difficulty determining just how much wrong doctrine can be tolerated before a church can no longer be considered a true church, but there are many clear cases where we can say that a true church does not exist.  When the preaching of a church conceals the gospel message of salvation by faith alone from its members, so that the gospel message is not clearly proclaimed, the group meeting there is not a church.

The second mark of the church, the right administration of the sacraments (bap­tism and the Lord’s Supper). Once an organization begins to practice baptism and the Lord’s Supper, it is a continuing organization and is attempting to function as a church. (In modern American society, an organization that begins to meet for worship and prayer and Bible teachings on Sunday mornings also would clearly be attempting to function as a church.)

Baptism and the Lord’s Supper also serve as “membership controls” for the church.  Baptism is the means for admitting people into the church, and the Lord’s Supper is the means for allowing people to give a sign of continuing in the membership of the church, the church signifies that it considers those who receive baptism and the Lord’s Supper to be saved.  Therefore, these activities indicate what a church thinks about salva­tion, and they are appropriately listed as a mark of the church today as well.  By contrast, groups who do not administer baptism and the Lord’s Supper signify that they are not intending to function as a church.  Someone may stand on a street corner with a small crowd and have true preaching and hearing of the Word, but the people there would not be a church.  Even a neighborhood Bible study meeting in a home can have the true teaching and hearing of the Word without becoming a church.  But if a local Bible study began baptizing its own new converts and regularly participating in the Lord’s Supper, these things would signify an intention to function as a church, and it would be difficult to say why it should not be considered a church in itself.

True and False Churches Today.  In view of the question posed during the Reforma­tion, what about the Roman Catholic Church today?  Is it a true church?  Here it seems that we cannot simply make a decision regarding the Roman Catholic Church as a whole, because it is far too diverse.  To ask whether the Roman Catholic Church is a true church or a false church today is somewhat similar to asking whether Protestant churches are true or false today, there is great variety among them.  Some Roman Catholic parishes certainly lack both marks: there is no pure preaching of the Word and the gospel mes­sage of salvation by faith in Christ alone is not known or received by people in the parish.  Participation in the sacraments is seen as a “work” that can earn merit with God.  Such a group of people is not a true Christian church.  On the other hand, there are many Roman Catholic parishes in various parts of the world today where the local priest has a genuine saving knowledge of Christ and a vital personal relationship with Christ in prayer and Bible study.  His own homilies and private teaching of the Bible place much emphasis on personal faith and the need for individual Bible reading and prayer.  His teaching on the sacraments emphasizes their symbolic and commemorative aspects much more than it speaks of them as acts that merit some infusion of saving grace from God.  In such a case, although we would have to say that we still have profound differences with Roman Catholic teaching on some doctrines, nonetheless, it would seem that such a church would have a close enough approximation to the two marks of the church that it would be hard to deny that it is in fact a true church.  It would seem to be a genuine congrega­tion of believers in which the gospel is taught (though not purely) and the sacraments are administered more rightly than wrongly.

Are there false churches within Protestantism?  If we again look at the two distinguish­ing marks of the church, in the judgment of this present writer it seems appropriate to say that many liberal Protestant churches are in fact false churches today.”  Is the gospel of works-righteousness and unbelief in Scripture that these churches teach any more likely to save people than did Roman Catholic teaching at the time of the Reformation?  And is not their administration of the sacraments without sound teaching to anyone who walks in the door likely to give as much false assurance to unregenerate sinners as did the Roman Catholic use of the sacraments at the time of the Reformation?  When there is an assembly of people who take the name “Christian” but consistently teach that people cannot believe their Bibles, indeed a church whose pastor and congregation seldom read their Bibles or pray in any meaningful way, and do not believe or perhaps even understand the gospel of salvation by faith in Christ alone, then how can we say that this is a true church?

 

The Purposes of the Church

  1. Ministry to God: Worship. In relationship to God the church’s purpose is to worship him.  Paul directs the church at Colossae to “sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in your hearts to God” (Colossians 3:16).  God has destined us and appointed us in Christ “to live for the praise of his glory” (Ephesians 1:12).  Worship in the church is not merely a preparation for something else: it is in itself fulfilling the major purpose of the church with reference to its Lord.  That is why Paul can follow an exhortation that we are to be “making the most of the time” with a command to be filled with the Spirit and then to be “singing and making melody to the Lord with all your heart” (Ephesians 5:16-19).
  2. Ministry to Believers: Nurture. According to Scripture, the church has an obligation to nurture those who are already believers and build them up to maturity in the faith.  Paul said that his own goal was not simply to bring people to initial saving faith but to “present every man mature in Christ” (Colossians 1:28).  And he told the church at Ephesus that God gave the church gifted persons “to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:12-13).  It is clearly contrary to the New Testament pattern to think that our only goal with people is to bring them to initial saving faith. Our goal as a church must be to present to God every Christian “mature in Christ” (Colossians 1:28).
  3. Ministry to the World: Evangelism and Mercy. Jesus told his disciples that they should “make disciples of all nations” (Matthews 28:19).  This evangelistic work of declaring the gospel is the primary ministry that the church has toward the world.  Yet accompanying the work of evangelism is also a ministry of mercy, a ministry that includes caring for the poor and needy in the name of the Lord.  Although the emphasis of the New Testament is on giving material help to those who are part of the church (Acts 11:29; 2 Corinthians 8:4; 1 John 3:17), there is still an affirmation that it is right to help unbelievers even if they do not respond with gratitude or acceptance of the gospel message. Jesus tells us,

Love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High; for he is kind to the ungrateful and the selfish. Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful. (Luke 6:35-36)

The point of Jesus’ explanation is that we are to imitate God in being kind to those who are being ungrateful and selfish as well.  We have the example of Jesus who did not attempt to heal only those who accepted him as Messiah.  Rather, when great crowds came to him, “he laid his hands on every one of them and healed them” (Luke 4:40).  This should give us encouragement to carry out deeds of kindness, and to pray for healing and other needs, in the lives of unbelievers as well as believers.  Such ministries of mercy to the world may also include participation in civic activities or attempting to influence governmental policies to make them more consistent with biblical moral principles.  In areas where there is systematic injustice manifested in the treatment of the poor and/or ethnic or religious minorities, the church should also pray and, as it has opportunity, speak against such injustice.  All of these are ways in which the church can supplement its evangelistic ministry to the world and indeed adorn the gospel that it professes.  But such ministries of mercy to the world should never become a substi­tute for genuine evangelism or for the other areas of ministry to God and to believers mentioned above.

  1. Keeping These Purposes in Balance. Once we have listed these three purposes for the church someone might ask; Which is most important?  Or someone else might ask; Might we neglect one of these three as less important than the others?

To that we must respond that all three purposes of the church are commanded by the Lord in Scripture; therefore, all three are important and none can be neglected.  In fact, a strong church will have effective ministries in all three of these areas.  We should beware of any attempts to reduce the purpose of the church to only one of these three and to say that it should be our primary focus.  In fact, such attempts to make one of these purposes primary will always result in some neglect of the other two.  A church that emphasizes only worship will end up with inadequate Bible teaching of believers and its members will remain shallow in their understanding of Scripture and immature in their Christian lives.  If it also begins to neglect evangelism the church will cease to grow and influence others; it will become ingrown and eventually begin to wither.

A church that places the edification of believers as a purpose that takes precedence over the other two will tend to produce Christians who know much Bible doctrine but have spiritual dryness in their lives because they know little of the joy of worshiping God or telling others about Christ.

But a church that makes evangelism such a priority that it causes the other two pur­poses to be neglected will also end up with immature Christians who emphasize growth in numbers but have less and less genuine love for God expressed in their worship and less and less doctrinal maturity and personal holiness in their lives.  All three purposes must be emphasized continually in a healthy church.

However, individuals are different from churches in placing a relative priority on one or another of these purposes of the church.  Because we are like a body with diverse spiritual gifts and abilities, it is right for us to place most of our emphasis on the fulfill­ment of that purpose of the church that is most closely related to the gifts and interests God has given to us.  There is certainly no obligation for every believer to attempt to give exactly one third of his or her time in the church to worship, one-third to nurturing other believers, and one-third to evangelism or deeds of mercy.  Someone with the gift of evan­gelism should of course spend some time in worship and caring for other believers, but may end up spending the vast majority of his or her time in evangelistic work.  Someone who is a gifted worship leader may end up devoting 90 percent of his time in the church toward preparation for and leading of worship.  This is only an appropriate response to the diversity of gifts that God has given us.